The Art and Architecture of Teaching and Learning: A Course Design Resource Hub

The art and architecture of teaching and learning design is a valuable collection of resources, reflections, strategies, discussion prompts, templates and techniques for artfully designing classroom materials and structuring spaces that centers students learning at Pratt Institute. Curated by the CTL, many of these resources come from Pratt colleagues themselves through shared materials, projects and showcases, while others are connecting outside materials for sparking new ideas and connections.  We envision this page to continue growing and changing as faculty continue sharing their practices with our community. 

We welcome your suggestions, contributions, and recommendations. If you find a section that might be missing, or have resources for a particular topic, please add comments and suggestions to this document and the CTL team will review for our next scheduled update of this page. The bibliography for this resource is viewable here.

Suggested ways to use these resources:

Individually: faculty can use this at the start of each semester to get new ideas, improve their course design, or to meet the needs of ‘in the moment’ challenges anytime during the semester.

With colleagues: faculty can use it as conversation starters or to address particular issues that arise across several courses

Within departments: Chairs may recommend particular resources to new faculty or the department to consider, as needed. 

With the CTL: The CTL will be referencing this page often during our events or conversations whenever relevant questions arise.  

Click on the gray boxes above to get started!

Course design 

In this section, you will find resources that will guide you through many aspects of the course design process: tips, templates, and resources for planning overall course lesson planning and learning design modules. 

Informed by best practices offered by nationally recognized organizations, such as the Online Learning Consortium, Quality Matters, and others, Pratt’s Guiding Principles for Quality Online Teaching provides clearly and easily implementable tips for designing online or hybrid classes, most of its sections directly apply to in person teaching and course design, as well. The CTL recommends that all teachers review this document and select strategies they could continue to work on to make their classes, in whatever format, more effective and conducive to learning.  

Course Design is an iterative process which faculty return to before, during, and after the semester:

Template: Pratt’s course syllabus template is a living document, maintained and continually updated by the Office of the Provost to include up-to-date policies, requirements, support services and resources for students. All Pratt faculty should utilize the official Course Syllabus Template, or update their syllabi to reflect semester-by-semester changes.  

Inviting students to connect with faculty during office hours is not only best recommended practice in higher education, it can provide essential learning support to many students. Re-thinking the way you offer your office hours or the kind of language you use on the syllabus to make such invitations can result in more students feeling included, invited and welcomed to such often ‘intimidating’ spaces. This resource provides some useful language and template on this topic. 

In addition to traditional text-based syllabi, visual syllabi can be powerful planning and communication tools, especially in art and design courses. 

Liquid syllabi are flexible, evolving course plans that are co-created between instructors and students rather than statically defined from the start. They can foster student investment by allowing learners to help shape assignments, deadlines, and even learning objectives based on their interests and needs.

If you’d like to rework an existing class session or lesson plan, or are writing a particular lesson plan for the first time, this recording – and the accompanying reflection prompts and resources – is a great place to start. Lesson Planning Workshop: Creating Significant Learning Experiences for Students: In this session, Rebecca Krucoff (Visiting Assistant Professor in ADE and GCPE) uses the backwards design framework to refine learning outcomes and goals, and then guides the process of designing course activities that work towards these outcomes and goals. Set aside a couple of hours to dig into these resources and apply these techniques to your own lesson plan, as the video recording leads you through step-by-step.

Bloom’s taxonomy is a classic framework for categorizing levels of learning objectives and skills. It provides a scaffold for sequencing activities and assessments from less to more complex cognitive processes. (An additional framework of Bloom’s Taxonomy is the Affective Domain, which includes emotional responses.) The levels progress as follows; with each level, we’ve included examples of how these components could be mapped to activities in arts/design courses. 

  • Remembering: recall facts and basic concepts
    • Identify formal properties of an artwork
    • Define art historical terminology
  • Understanding: explain ideas or concepts 
    • Explain elements and principles of design   
    • Discuss the cultural context influencing an artistic style
  • Applying: use information in new situations
    • Compose a painting using color theory 
    • Classify artworks into historical styles based on aesthetic qualities
  • Analyzing: draw connections between elements 
    • Compare cultural symbols in a media piece 
    • Examine the work of a given artist and infer symbolic meaning
  • Evaluating: critique and justify based on criteria  
    • Determine whether a design meets project criteria
    • Participate in a thoughtful class critique
  • Creating: produce new work or ideas
    • Create an original sculpture 
    • Compose a work that combines multiple historical styles 

A suggestion for achieving active learning in classrooms and studios often involves students working in groups. There are many advantages of this pedagogical approach, which include: students developing metacognition, applying concepts and solving problems collaboratively, improving critical thinking and getting support from peers.  Group work can also be quite challenging to manage, as it involves complex cognitive and affective elements of human social interactions.

Guidelines for Group work document and accompanying presentation based on The Case & Context for Collaborative and Cooperative (Team) Learning by J. Cuseo (1992)

Teaching Strategies for Effective Group Work and additional resources / articles

Powered By EmbedPress

With changes to digital communication, differences in teaching throughout the pandemic, and larger shifts in the way that reading is taught in primary schools, faculty across campuses have wondered: “Is This the End of Reading?” 

The CTL believes that reading and writing skills are still essential, and can still be taught and supported within Pratt courses. Rather than doing away with reading assignments entirely, we suggest carefully structuring reading assignments with detailed steps, guiding students through the process, and giving opportunities for peer-to-peer support. 

Active reading documents (here’s a short video overview of the concept, as well as a detailed article) can provide a scaffolded structure for students to incrementally work through dense texts with guided prompts. The theory behind ARDs moves students through progressive layers of understanding: retrieval -> comprehension -> analysis -> knowledge utilization. Try working through an ARD in class first (either a whole group or small groups) to reduce the intimidation factor when students return to the text individually in a homework assignment. Guided notes can be another version of this.

Socially Engaged Reading promotes student engagement through collective annotation of course readings and other documents. In this Faculty Spotlight presentation, Lara Allen (HMS) and Amanda Matles (SSCS) show and tell about two socially engaged reading platforms, Perusall and Hypothes.is. They discuss how instructors can integrate these tools to support peer instruction, reading assignment accountability, flipped classrooms, and active learning.

Annotated readings can additionally encourage students to actively engage with the text. By close reading and annotating the text, (we recommend doing this first in-class, rather than introducing it as a homework assignment) students often indicate what their misunderstandings are. This provides helpful feedback going forwards as you continue structuring reading assignments – for example, if you notice that students frequently mis-interpret discipline-specific language, providing a vocab sheet can be helpful.

Jigsaw guided reading! Students work together, during class time, to digest and understand small chunks of the text. This can help them to familiarize themselves with the writing style of the author, and ask questions of their peers when they don’t understand something. Start with a warm-up task to encourage positive group dynamics before having them dive into a dense passage – it’s a lot easier to ask your peers for help if you’ve already gotten to know them by playing a quick game together or drawing something collaboratively.

Classroom Management

Classroom management involves our proactive and intentional plans for our classroom environment and interactions as well as our responses to the unplanned. There are some essential ingredients that we can incorporate into our teaching practice and cultivate within our classrooms that make classroom management more organic, egalitarian, and distributed: transparent expectations and clear communication; a sense of community and the development of trust between everyone in the learning space; and models for positive engagement and for appropriately responding to difficult situations.

Transparent Expectations are necessary for establishing consistency and routine in the classroom and setting students up for success in your course. These expectations are not only academic, but also social and behavioral.

Syllabus: The syllabus is one obvious tool for setting out transparent expectations.

  • This post from the University of Michigan Center for Research on Learning and Teaching discusses strategies for balancing flexibility and accountability in the classroom, including in relation to making up missed work, assignment extensions, and attendance;
  • This post from the University of North Carolina offers suggestions for clearly communicating your policies related to flexibility and your expectations of your students, including sample syllabus language you might adopt or adapt.

Student Expectations: It’s also important to make what students can or should expect from you transparent. This includes expectations about things like how often and when you will respond to emails, the turn-around time for grades/feedback on assignments, your office hours and location (and what office hours are even for!), etc.

Maintaining Expectations: Transparency requires reminders about your expectations; return to your expectations often and help maintain them by recontextualizing them as the semester progresses.

Clear Communication is necessary for maintaining your expectations as the semester progresses and navigating the inevitable bumps and adjustments that arise. Communication occurs both in and out of the classroom, so it is important to consider what makes for clear communication in different modalities (in-class oral communication, out-of-class emails and other written communications, and even instructions for assignments).

Digital Communication: Here are some basic tips for clear and consistent email/digital communication with students, addressing considerations like format and tone.

Communication about Accommodations: The L/AC Faculty Handbook has some excellent tips for communicating with students about their accommodations, as well as some communication practices to avoid.

Nonviolent and Healthy Communication: Although we may not realize it, many of the communication habits that we are socialized into have an immense capacity for causing harm. When this harm shows up in our classrooms, it can disrupt the learning that is happening there. Nonviolent communication is a set of principles designed to increase mindfulness about what and how we communicate and to use empathy to minimize harmful communication. Here are 9 healthy ways to communicate using the principles of nonviolent communication.

Invite Communication from Students: Communication goes both ways. It’s important to provide multiple means for your students to communicate with you. In addition to direct communication (via your official Pratt email, your Canvas course site, or another platform), you might consider incorporating the following into your communication practice:

Low-stakes/weekly assignments like these can help you to confirm that you and your students have a shared understanding of the work for the class and the criteria by which it will be evaluated. They also invite your students to raise questions/concerns early and often, rather than after a deadline or right before grades are due.

A Sense of Community supports classroom management by cultivating mutual and reciprocal investment in the collective work and wellbeing of the class. Essential aspects of community include care and concern for one another and shared support of one another.

The First Day of Class: In The New College Classroom, Cathy Davidson and Christina Katopodis provide a number of strategies for fostering interest on the first day of class:

  • Activities for engaging students with the syllabus (like scavenger hunts, mapping activities, collaborative annotations, peer teaching, and interactive surveys);
  • Framing the classroom as a space where knowledge is co-created and learning happens from multiple directions, not just from professor to student (e.g., by asking students to introduce themselves, including the skills and strengths they bring to the class);
  • Model metacognition and provide students an opportunity to reflect on how they learn, emphasizing your interest in and concern for their learning;
  • Co-create a class constitution or a set of community guidelines with your students that addresses topics like classroom discussion and respectful disagreement as well as institutional policies (e.g., academic integrity, attendance, etc.), making these concerns concrete and relevant in the context of this particular course.

Academic and Wellbeing Support: Include information about academic and wellness resources on your syllabus (as the Pratt Syllabus Template does). When reviewing the syllabus in your class, don’t skip over this part; spend some time with it to show your students that you care about their academic success and general wellbeing and to normalize seeking support on campus. You can work through the CTL’s asynchronous Supporting Faculty series to learn more about the various support offices and services available to students.

Wellbeing and Mindfulness: You can incorporate various wellbeing and mindfulness activities into your class in order to promote full presence in the classroom, metacognition, resilience, and self-awareness and social awareness, all of which can contribute to the building and maintaining of community.

Community Needs: Our program Creative Accommodations (co-created with the Learning/Access Center) provokes reflection on student and faculty needs in and out of the classroom and provides resources for creating and maintaining a collaborative and supportive learning environment where those needs can be met, with particular focus on supporting students with accommodations.

The Development of Trust is an imperative ingredient when it comes to creating learning environments that are conducive to generative and collaborative interaction. It is also essential for fostering resilience in the face of interpersonal difficulties and challenges.

Welcoming Environment: Cultivating a welcoming environment is the first step toward developing trust. Here are a few strategies for achieving this:

  • Make an effort, from the first day, to learn students’ names and their proper pronunciation in order to build the trust and rapport necessary for classroom management. You can use NameCoach in Canvas to facilitate this. The Office of International Affairs, with the CTL, has also provided a Chinese Pronunciation Workshop.
  • Listen to your students and take some time to learn about the diversity of student backgrounds, experiences, and needs. 
    • In 2014, students from Stanford’s First-Generation and/or Low-Income Partnership produced a video about their experiences feeling welcomed or alienated in the classroom: What I Wish My Professor Knew. The program has continued to grow since then. The students address some of the potentially alienating assumptions that instructors might make about: students’ opportunities in high school (e.g., the availability of AP classes); students’ familiarity with higher education (e.g., an assumed understanding of what “office hours” are); students’ home lives (e.g., having their own bedroom); and students’ choice of majors (e.g., expecting students to choose a major because they have a passion for it, rather than for more practical or pragmatic reasons). Many students emphasized that they really just wanted their instructors to listen to their experience, rather than try to identify with it or claim to share it.
    • In March 2023, Inside Higher Ed published an article titled What Students Want (and Don’t) from Their Professors. This article presents data on what advances and what inhibits academic success, as reported by students. The primary inhibition to academic success at the college level, as identified by students, is inflexibility with teaching styles (and this is compounded for students with disabilities and for students who identify as LGBTQIA+). The article also provides data on what college students identify as the most important changes instructors can make to advance student success. 
    • This video and this article may be informative for teaching at Pratt, but we shouldn’t take it for granted that they are representative of Pratt students. Rather, we can take the principles and strategies behind these resources—curiosity, care, flexibility, adaptability—and apply them in our own classrooms to better understand our students and avoid alienating and harmful assumptions as we create a welcoming environment.

Pedagogical Transparency: Transparency is essential to trust. In addition to making your expectations transparent, as discussed above, you should also strive to make your pedagogical choices and actions transparent. Explain what you’re doing and why you’re doing it so that students can see how everything works together and that each element of your course design and delivery is intentional, not arbitrary. If you’ve made changes to your teaching in response to past student feedback, point this out to your current students so that they see evidence that you value student feedback about the learning experience.

Accountability: Inevitably, we make mistakes in the classroom. When you make a mistake, acknowledge it and apologize. An important part of building trusting relationships is taking the proper steps to repair those relationships after that trust has been damaged or violated, however unintentionally. If you have a classroom constitution or a set of community guidelines, this might be an opportunity to highlight its importance or even to amend it to reflect what everyone has learned from the mistake.

Psychological Safety: Transparency and accountability can contribute to the fostering of psychological safety in your classroom or studio, creating a learning space where students feel safe pushing themselves beyond their comfort zones, taking risks, and freely expressing themselves. Here are some more tips for fostering psychological safety.

Group Dynamics: Trust goes beyond the relationship between individual students and the instructor and even beyond the relationship between the class as a whole and the instructor; relationships between students also matter for developing trust in the classroom. This trust between students is especially important when it comes to group work. Here are some strategies for effective group work in the college classroom. When using group work, it’s also important to consider the power dynamics and power differentials among the students in your class.

Assessing Classroom Trust: The Classroom Dynamics Effectiveness Guide can help you evaluate many of the areas touched upon in this section.

Modeling Positive Engagement demonstrates how one should approach the course content and the learning space and encourages students to engage with these productively and meaningfully. Doing this not only shows students how to engage positively, it also shows why it is important to do so and what can be gained from doing so.

Passion: Enthusiasm can be contagious. When you demonstrate your passion for your discipline and your teaching, students tend to respond to and mirror that enthusiasm.

Preparation: Arriving to class prepared and ready to begin on time demonstrates the importance of doing so for students. It also communicates that your class has value and should be approached as such.

Productive Feedback: Giving useful feedback to others is not something we know how to do innately; rather, it is a skill that we have to learn and refine over time. Design means for demonstrating this skill in your particular discipline and create opportunities for students to practice this skill in your class early on, before any formal critiques or peer reviews.

Positive Classroom Interactions: Identify and emphasize the importance of developing positive interpersonal relationships in the classroom and striving for positive interactions within the classroom community. Co-creating a class constitution or set of community guidelines and returning to these often can help maintain positive classroom interactions.

Modeling Appropriate Responses to Difficult Situations means providing an example of how we ought to engage with one another as full humans, in all of our complexity, especially when doing so becomes challenging. The classroom management strategies detailed above should, ideally, contribute to the creation of a classroom environment that is sensitive and empathetic and that can bounce back from difficult or challenging moments. It is, nonetheless, important to be prepared for a variety of difficult and challenging scenarios in the classroom.

Critical Conversations: We are currently developing more resources and programs related to Critical Conversations in the Classroom. Check this page on our website for news and updates! This is part of a campus-wide initiative on Critical Conversations, so be sure to check out what other offices are doing!

Challenging Behavior: This edutopia article presents 4 Steps to Discussing Challenging Behavior with a Student. Although it is focused on behavioral concerns, these four steps are a good template for one-on-one conversations with students about many other concerns, including concerns related to attendance, academic performance, and missing or late assignments.

Microaggressions: Microaggressions are subtle, everyday communications of prejudice, bias, or discrimination, whether conveyed by words, actions, or other means and whether intentional or not. The University of Washington has provided a guide to Addressing Microaggressions in the Classroom. Dr. Derald Wing Sue explains the concept of microaggressions and the harms they cause in this PBS NewsHour interview. Finally, Arizona State University offers this guide to Navigating Classroom Conflict: Cultural Insensitivity, which addresses culturally insensitive behaviors and statements, including microaggressions.

HOT Moments: Here are a few specific strategies for responding to Heated/Hurtful, Offensive, and Tense (HOT) moments in the classroom:

Difficult Situations: Here are three comprehensive guides for responding to difficult situations in the classroom:

These resources and tools are, first and foremost, proactive. They are primarily helpful for creating and sustaining a positive classroom environment, for preventing and de-escalating potential incidents, rather than responding to incidents that are rapidly approaching or have already reached a crisis point.

It is also necessary to acknowledge that the identities that we, as educators, bring into the classroom matter when it comes to classroom management. Our race, our gender, our religion, our age, and other aspects of our identity impact the classroom environment, our options for managing it, and student perceptions of how we manage it. Mark Chesler and Alford A Young, Jr., explore this in their article “Faculty Members’ Social Identities and Classroom Authority.” Given this, the suggestions for classroom management provided above are not neutral; the efficacy, or even the possibility, of their implementation is not the same across all faculty members. Our programming at the CTL often centers these complexities and nuances as well as the many forms of inequity and injustice in higher education. We warmly invite you to join these conversations.

Pedagogical Styles and methods

There are many evidence-based teaching methods that can enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. This section explores a variety of pedagogical approaches faculty can incorporate into their courses, drawing examples from the SoTL (Scholarship of Teaching and Learning) research of Pratt faculty.

Active learning – Whether you’re looking to integrate active learning in your classroom for the first time or are problem-solving a lack of student engagement, look through the KP Cross Academy techniques archive. Short videos and instructor guides give detailed information about implementing 50 different techniques in your course. Techniques include: jigsaw group work, guided lecture notes, note taking pairs, and much more. 

Student Centered Teaching Methods:  This document has a table with many simple activities to integrate in courses across disciplines, with cited studies and research demonstrating the enhancement to student learning with the incorporation of these methods.

Twenty-One Teaching Strategies to Promote Student Engagement and Cultivate Classroom Equity: While this article was written from a perspective of a biology faculty, the teaching strategies discussed within are very much relevant to most all disciplines, especially in Humanities, Sciences, and Social Sciences.  The 21 strategies include topics such as student participation, small groups, integrating culturally diverse examples, using praise with caution and not judging responses. Faculty will find most of these topics relevant, and all of them will initiate discussions about their own classroom, whether in agreement or disagreement with the author’s claims. 

Discussion based teaching: often referred to as using Socratic Questions, discussion based teaching is a helpful strategy that enables students to critically examine ideas and engage with each other on higher level thinking. This method encourages students to evaluate their arguments and consider alternative perspectives. The CTL suggests that interested faculty incorporate a set of these Socratic questions intentionally into discussion-based whole group or small group activities.

Project/Team/Object-Based Learning – PBL, TBL, and OBL integrate collaborative work solving open-ended problems into the curriculum to situate learning in real-world contexts. Whether centered on projects, teams, or objects of inquiry, these processes build accountability, communication abilities, and global perspectives.

Open Pedagogy – Open pedagogy situates students as possessors and co-creators of knowledge. Open pedagogical practices ask students to add value to the world through their knowledge and their learning, rather than merely asking them to demonstrate that they have received knowledge and can now reproduce it. Collaboration and sharing, even across semesters, are common elements in open pedagogy, as seen in projects like co-written textbooks, wikis, tutorial videos, community proposals, etc.

Inclusive Teaching

An inclusive classroom is one where all students feel respected, supported, and able to fully participate. This section includes a variety of approaches faculty can use to create a more inclusive classroom environment.

Setting ground rules and expectations at the start of the term helps build a respectful classroom culture. This recording from Setting the Stage for an Inclusive Classroom, an event with the Office of DEI, is a great place to start.

Created and shared by a working group at Pratt Institute’s Interior Design, this Faculty DEI Self-Assessment Questionnaire is a practical tool for faculty to reflect on ways of making their course design more inclusive. It is recommended to work through these questions one at a time individually or a group to identify and discuss the questions about the syllabus, assignments, grading and more. 

The Anti-Racist Discussion Pedagogy: This guide emphasizes that anti-racist pedagogy starts with instructor self-reflection, then moves outward through discussion to engage students. It provides communication guidelines to facilitate these discussions and prompts to spark reflection.

Trauma-informed teaching involves creating an environment founded on physical, emotional, and academic safety; building trust through transparency and mutual respect; empowering student voice and agency; and promoting resilience and growth. 

Open educational resources (OERs) increase accessibility by providing free, openly licensed course materials that allow faculty to curate inclusive content. OER eliminates textbook costs that create barriers for low-income students, enables faculty remixing of materials to meet UDL needs, and empowers students as co-creators. Explore the resources and recording from Community Over Commercialization, a panel discussion on OER hosted in Fall 2023.

Here are the Pratt Libraries LibGuides on Open Educational Resources and Open Access Resources for more information.

Community building leads to a sense of embeddedness, which is essential to a student’s ability to learn in your class. Check out the self-paced Pedagogy Refresh Community resource that the CTL put together with resources, short videos from Pratt colleagues, and reflection prompts. Set aside a couple of hours to dive into this resource and reflect on how community building supports your class. 

This resource from Ohio State University dives into the ways in which a sense of belonging benefits learners in the classroom, and provides practical steps to shape a positive learning environment.

Are you interested in increasing the accessibility of your course for students with and without accommodation letters? Universal Design for Learning is an approach to course design which emphasizes three principles for increasing student success: multiple means of representation of information, multiple means of student action and expression, and multiple means of student engagement. 

To get started with UDL, explore the Pedagogy Refresh UDL self-paced resource put together by the Pratt CTL with support from several Pratt faculty members.

Once you’re familiar with the principles of Universal Design for Learning, use these self-guided reflection questions to review an assignment or lesson plan from your course with UDL as a guiding framework:

  • What are possible barriers to engagement, and what are some options that you are considering to increase engagement?
  • What are possible barriers to action and expression, and what are some options that you are considering to address action and expression?
  • What are possible barriers to representation, and what are some options that you are considering to address representation?

Additional UDL Resources: 

Feedback and Evaluation

Feedback and evaluation are essential parts of the college classroom. In this section, we explore many approaches faculty can take to evaluate creative work and provide students with feedback throughout the term. 

Providing consistent and timely feedback on student work, beyond just assigning a grade, helps students continuously improve and reflect on their learning. Start with the self-paced Pedagogy Refresh Feedback: Self- and Peer-Assessment resource to learn more.

Low-stakes formative assessments help students assess their knowledge and areas for improvement on the class content before reaching a final grade or major project. 

Best practices for evaluating creative work: 

  • Focus on growth over time. Recognize improvement by comparing student work to their own previous submissions rather than directly to peers. 
  • Contextualize work with intention statements: understand what students’ own goals are, and whether or not they believe they achieved their own intentions.
  • Provide both formative and summative assessments. 
  • Use rubrics and be transparent about grading criteria. Evaluate both process and product.
  • Give feedback on both technique and concept. 
  • Establish a culture that separates critique from judgment. 
  • Recognize and mitigate bias: reflect on how your own taste, background, and identity impacts your perspective. Encourage your students to do the same.

Critique Sentence Starters, by Allison Yasukawa (Maryland Institute College of Art), can be a helpful tool for students to build their critique vocabulary – particularly for ELL students and students with public speaking anxiety.

Liz Lerman’s Critical Response Process can provide guidance and structure in critiques. This facilitates reflective dialogue through four phases:  

  • Statements of Meaning: Students share gut reactions and what stands out to them about the work 
  • Artist Questions: The artist poses questions directly to peers about their experience of the work and its intent
  • Responders Ask Questions: Peers ask neutral questions about the work to better understand the choices made
  • Opinion Time: Peers share opinions, suggestions, and alternative possibilities in a constructive way

Many folks on our campus and beyond are exploring alternative means of assessment. These alternate forms of assessment have the ability to open up our frameworks for feedback, as well as the ability to redress issues of equity and labor within the classroom.

  • Why Go Gradeless?: At the 2021 CTL Fall Forum, James Lipovac and Leslie Mutchler presented together on “Why Go Gradeless?”. The slides from this presentation are a great resource if you’d like to think through the reasoning a bit more, and to see what it looks like mapped onto a specific department (Foundation).
  • Ungrading Resources: A very solid, straightforward, and simple view of ungrading from Barnard, this is a good site if you’re curious and want to ‘poke around’ a bit to see if ungrading might be right for you.
  • Resources from James Lipovac’s CTL Fellowship focused on Gradeless Assessment. As part of his year-long Fellowship, James leaned into self reflection as the assessment tool for his Foundation classes. He accumulated many many resources and examples, and is kind enough to share them here on this Milanote board. 
  • Contract Grading great slideshow. Looking towards Elbow & Danielewicz (2008), this professor steps through the aspects of “contract grading” that felt like a great alternative to traditional grading systems. Among some of the draws are that it’s a student-centered practice, it decreases the traditional hierarchical structures a bit, and that it can be ‘uncomplicated’. In an easily digestible slideshow, see if this is a good fit for you, your students, and your classroom!
  • Critique-Driven Learning and Assessment in the Beyond the Curriculum: Ungrading Podcast
  • “A Practice of Freedom”: Self-Grading for Liberatory Learning

Powered By EmbedPress

50 Techniques for Assessing Course-Related Knowledge & Skills: These Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs) are divided into sections for assessing skills in these areas: Prior Knowledge, Recall, and Understanding; Analysis and Critical Thinking; Synthesis and Creative Thinking; Problem Solving; & Application and Performance. Additionally, there are methods for assessing Learner Attitudes, Values, and Self-Awareness.

In addition to providing ongoing formative feedback our students throughout the semester, it’s also a good idea to rely on formative student feedback on how they feel the course it going for them, what they identify as supports or challenges, and how such Mid-Semester Formative Student Feedback allows faculty to 1/ pivot and respond to student needs 2/ continue the open communication with students and 3/ strengthening trust in the classroom or studio, listening, building community, and ultimately iterating on initial course design to better fit the present context the current students.

CCBY40

© 2025 Pratt Institute Center for Teaching and Learning.
Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close